Sunday, March 29, 2015

Victoria Secret

Victoria Secret runway shows are known for being very sexualized and representative of the clothes and garments that Victoria Secret associates with. Three years ago, however, at the annual Victoria Secret show in New York, something happened that stirred up more controversy than was ever intended.

Karlie Kloss, who at the time of this show was twenty years old, was supposedly representing the month of November as she walked down the catwalk. However, Kloss did so by offending many, many people. Kloss wore a Native American costume complete with a headdress. Instantly, there was an outrage among viewers.

People who identify as or with Native Americans claimed that Kloss's outfit at the show was horribly offensive. Below, I posted an article that illustrates why this model's costume became such a scandal.

Hollywood Reporter

Here's another article with more pictures of Kloss sporting her costume.

Huffington Post

One of the biggest points to take away from this article is the fact that Victoria Secret was essentially endorsing cultural appropriation. Cultural appropriation is when something (businesses) or someone takes elements of another culture, often sacred and symbolic, and presents it in a shallow manner. It's turning someone's culture into a trend or commodity.

Cultural appropriation is the main issue we are presented with here. Although Victoria Secret did apologize and ended up removing the costume from the show completely, it doesn't change the fact that they did it in the first place. Their image was severely tainted in the public eye because of this mishap. Let's break down how this New York scandal is the exact definition of cultural appropriation.

First of all, Kloss is seen wearing a headdress (war bonnet). The headdress is said to be one of the most symbolic and sacred aspects of the Native American culture/attire. As Ruth Hopkins from the Hollywood Reporter article writes, a war bonnet is only something worn if earned. In addition, it is traditionally worn exclusively by men and each feather comprising the war bonnet is symbolic of an act of braveness committed by those men. Hopkins was tremendously offended by Kloss's headdress and for a very valid reason.

Second of all, Victoria Secret is doing exactly what the definition of cultural appropriation says, turning someone's culture into a trend or commodity. Victoria Secret runway shows are fashion shows. These shows that are put on every year are intended to exhibit fashion, clothes, and trends.

So what is the solution when we witness cultural appropriation?

Don't endorse it. It's important to recognize when you see cultural appropriation. When you see it, don't act like it's normal. It's very offensive. In this 2012 fashion show, many viewers thought it was normal and nothing was offensive about it. But it's important to think about how it's affecting people other than you. It's key to look at this front other people's perspectives. As I was reading what Ruth Hopkins was saying in the first article, it made absolute sense as to why there was such an outrage created. And lastly, don't be afraid to say something. I can only imagine how many people thought in the back of their minds that this could possibly be offensive and could be marginalizing Native Americans. The majority of people who spoke out against it were Native Americans, however. I'm not implying that everyone needs to take a stand, but little differences in what is seen as acceptable in today's society can lead to a bigger change than you might have thought possible.


3 comments:

  1. Surprisingly, I had never even heard about this incident before now. The fashion world is a strange place where one can pull this sort of thing in the name of commodification disguised as "art" or "self expression". This seems, however, to be nothing new in the market (even it it was refreshingly blatant).
    One thing i do wonder about this whole situation in Victoria's Secret is where the blame seems to be. Particularly dealing with the model, in where it was her that wore the costume at the show. However did she have much of a choice in the matter? She could've said no for moral reasons, but then in the world of competitive modeling how many other choices does she have if she desires to stay there? There is something to be said when the modeling business (a classic practitioner in the objectification of women) slips a by a bit too cleanly when the model gets more flack than may be appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think a lot of time models get away with doing things like this because like you said it's "art". But this offended a lot of people. And I actually thought about whether the model had any say in what she was wearing also. Victoria Secret might have just made her wear it for the sake of the show and then she took a lot of the heat for it.

      Delete
  2. It's crazy that we did the same topic! I like how you focused on one aspect, the diabolical with Victoria's Secret and how they used the headdress during one of their shows. I also like how you ended your post with what to do when you witness cultural appropriation, some people are unaware of what cultural appropriation is so it is nice that you point out things that can be done when you come across it.

    ReplyDelete